" I believe that the Managerial Revolution is, to the Systemic Organism, something akin to the Cognitive Revolution in humanity some 70,000 years ago. "
I think it's now safe to say that Francis's Leviathan is the Beast of the Deep itself. Finally gaining self-consciousness, finally emerging after long lurking beneath the surface. No coincidence that this Beast is Antichristian in its teleology: liquidating all of Christendom here at the end of the pisces aeon which Christ's birth marked the beginning of.
Worth noting further that the Industrial Revolution, which sparked this Managerial Revolution, was itself enabled only by the combination of Enlightenment Technology and Usury, which is borrowing from the future. Europeans leveraged their technology with usury to gain a military advantage over other nations, and it commenced a chain-reaction, it pushed the world down an incentive gradient, where everyone suddenly had to rush to massify, because if you didn't, then you'd be subjugated by someone who did. Again, all only enabled by usury. We are literally stealing from our unborn children, and all of our children are disappearing as a result, to help this beast assemble itself from the future. Saturn eating his child, a black hole devouring the world, a demon enslaving humanity.
Hmm im not sure thats how i would frame Yarvin Thought. Imo, the idea of Monarch has less to do with a human v. system in charge, and more to do with breaking the corruption of the previous oligarchy. And as for what humans will do post AGI, Yarvin is perfectly happy to advocate for bullshit jobs that fill the simulacra of meaning that humans desire.
Tbh, i dont really have a better answer either for the obsolescence of humanity in the face of impending AI dominance across every field of activity that defined human excellence, and the permanent reduction of our species to luxury consumption
Yeah to be clear, Yarvin is absolutely not using my framework or way of thinking about this. However, my understanding as described here ultimately reaches a similar conclusion, that being that the concentration of power in a human individual may well be necessary to realign these systems to pro-human interests. We merely converge at the same conclusion as derived by radically different means.
"maybe what is needed is for a human, as in a human individual, to have complete supremacy over the will of systems."
You cannot wield it. None of us can. Concentrate your will on the magma chambers.
" I believe that the Managerial Revolution is, to the Systemic Organism, something akin to the Cognitive Revolution in humanity some 70,000 years ago. "
I think it's now safe to say that Francis's Leviathan is the Beast of the Deep itself. Finally gaining self-consciousness, finally emerging after long lurking beneath the surface. No coincidence that this Beast is Antichristian in its teleology: liquidating all of Christendom here at the end of the pisces aeon which Christ's birth marked the beginning of.
Worth noting further that the Industrial Revolution, which sparked this Managerial Revolution, was itself enabled only by the combination of Enlightenment Technology and Usury, which is borrowing from the future. Europeans leveraged their technology with usury to gain a military advantage over other nations, and it commenced a chain-reaction, it pushed the world down an incentive gradient, where everyone suddenly had to rush to massify, because if you didn't, then you'd be subjugated by someone who did. Again, all only enabled by usury. We are literally stealing from our unborn children, and all of our children are disappearing as a result, to help this beast assemble itself from the future. Saturn eating his child, a black hole devouring the world, a demon enslaving humanity.
Hmm im not sure thats how i would frame Yarvin Thought. Imo, the idea of Monarch has less to do with a human v. system in charge, and more to do with breaking the corruption of the previous oligarchy. And as for what humans will do post AGI, Yarvin is perfectly happy to advocate for bullshit jobs that fill the simulacra of meaning that humans desire.
Tbh, i dont really have a better answer either for the obsolescence of humanity in the face of impending AI dominance across every field of activity that defined human excellence, and the permanent reduction of our species to luxury consumption
Yeah to be clear, Yarvin is absolutely not using my framework or way of thinking about this. However, my understanding as described here ultimately reaches a similar conclusion, that being that the concentration of power in a human individual may well be necessary to realign these systems to pro-human interests. We merely converge at the same conclusion as derived by radically different means.